This came from Andy Bensing and his organization Deer Recovery of Pennsylvania:
The effort to legalize
Leashed Tracking Dogs for recovering wounded deer in PA has been ongoing for 17
years and right now we are the closest we have ever been and almost
there. The PA Game Commission, PFSC, USP, UBP, QDMA ,NRA and 97% of PA
hunters as of the last survey taken support the legalization of Leashed
Tracking Dogs. HB1722 which will legalize the use of Leashed Tracking
Dogs has passed the House and is awaiting a final vote on the Senate floor.
The problem is that HB1722 has been languishing on the Senate Calendar for the
last month and has not been brought up for the final vote. There are 2
weeks left in Harrisburg before the Senate goes on Summer Recess. If
HB1722 doesn’t come up for vote by the end of June, PA hunters will be going
another hunting season this fall without access to Leashed Tracking Dogs.
The Leashed Tracking Dog movement needs every hunter’s help right now.
There is no time to waste. To help make this finally happen, here is what
you need to do.
Send an email or letter to Senator Jake Corman right away. Tell him you
support HB1722, the Leashed Tracking Dog bill, and ask him to bring it up
for a final vote on the Senate floor. If you are really feeling
motivated, in addition to sending an email, call his office and let his office
know you would like him to bring HB1722 up for vote. Senator Corman is
the Leader in the Senate and he is in charge of deciding which bills get a
chance to be voted on. Here is the contact info for Senator Corman: http://www.senatorcorman.com/contact/
Tracking dogs for finding wounded big game. Also dachshunds for blood tracking, field trials, their breeding, training and more.
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label blood tracking regulations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blood tracking regulations. Show all posts
Friday, June 17, 2016
Help needed NOW with the Leashed Tracking Bill in PA
Friday, February 6, 2015
New Jersey’s Leashed Tracking Dog Program: Call to Action
by Darren Doran
This article was published in the Winter 2015 issue of Tracks and Trails, publication of the United Bowhunters of New Jersey
Unlike in the Southern States dogs and deer hunting have never mixed in the
Northeast. Over fifty years ago the New Jersey legislature passed a law that
prevented dogs to be used to hunt deer. The law is as follows.
23:4-46. Dogs not to be used
No person shall at any time, or for any reason, hunt
for, track, search for, seek, capture or kill a wild deer with a dog.
Amended by L.1957, c. 116, p. 488, s. 1, eff. July 2,
1957.
This law was enacted to protect a fragile, recovering deer population
from over-hunting, and what was considered an unfair advantage with the use of
dogs.
Since that time New Jersey and its whitetail population has vastly
changed. The loss of habitat to development and the ability of white-tailed
deer to adapt to these landscape changes has created a thriving population of
deer as well as greatly increased hours of recreational hunting in order to
manage this increased deer population. Bow season now starts as early as
mid-September in some parts of New Jersey when it is typically hot and the
forest is still in full foliage. Add the seemingly increasing presence of
coyotes to the scene and it becomes extremely important to recover deer that
have been shot by hunters as quickly as possible to prevent spoilage or loss of
venison from scavenging.
Most deer shot by bowhunters are recovered by the hunters themselves,
but every bowhunter knows that even a well placed arrow that kills quickly can
produce a blood trail that is very sparse or non-existent for a human to
follow. A deer is a valuable resource and every ethical hunter will do
everything in their power to recover a deer they have shot. A leashed tracking
dog is a conservation tool that can help recover a deer that a hunter might not
have been able to recover him or herself. This law that was originally designed
to aid in the restoration of whitetails never took into consideration the
conservation use of a leashed tracking dog to help recover a deer for a hunter.
Currently there are 37 states that allow some kind of big game recovery
with a dog. New Jersey’s experimental tracking program began in 2008 when the
New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife issued a special wildlife management
permit to study the usefulness and feasibility of using a leashed tracking dog
to recover deer that had been shot by hunters who were having issues recovering
those deer on their own.
The research permit is issued to Dr. Leonard Wolgast and it is he who
is tasked with compiling and analyzing the data from the sub-permitees which
are the dog handlers. That first permit had only three handlers on it which
covered a limited area of the state, and had a very limited scope. Today there
are 11 certified handlers and dogs on the permit, and tracking by these
handler/dog teams may be conducted statewide.
The tracking permit is issued before the start of the early bow season
in September and a new handler must be certified by mid-August in order to be
included on that permit.
In order to show credibility to the program and basic ability, a
handler and dog must complete at a minimum, a United Blood Trackers UBT 1
evaluation. This evaluation is a pass fail evaluation administrated by a UBT
judge and requires the dog and handler to complete an unmarked test line
consisting of 8 oz. of deer blood, 400 meters long with two 90 degree turns and
1 wound bed. The line is at least 2 hours old and the dog must lead the handler
to the deer skin at the end. There are currently two UBT judges in New Jersey.
Upon successful completion of the evaluation, the handler and dog team
will receive a certificate from the United Blood Trackers and inclusion on New
Jersey’s permit. The handler by inclusion on the permit is then required to
complete the tracking data and submit it monthly to Dr Wolgast. A tracker that
does not submit their monthly reports or year-end report may be removed from
the permit.
Before a tracker enters the woods with a hunter a track report is
started. This includes the name, address, phone, email and CID number of the
hunter. The location of the property is also included on the report. The hunter
then signs the top part of this report stating that he has permission to hunt
this property and that tracking is allowed. The handler then calls the regional
law enforcement office in that area and reports the tracking attempt to the
office. If the deer is recovered the hunter must sign the report stating that
the deer was recovered.
During the tracking process all Fish and Game laws and regulations
pertaining to that season must be followed. The tracking of a deer does not
allow trespassing on private property without permission of the land owner.
In the early years of the research permit, few New Jersey hunters knew
this service was available to them. As time passed the word has spread, and
today more and more hunters are taking advantage of certified tracker and dog
teams to assist in the recovery of a deer they can’t find on their own.
All the trackers are volunteers and there is no cost for this service (though a tracker is allowed to accept a donation for fuel, vet bills, dog food
etc.). Please keep this in mind when you call a tracker and they are unable to
respond. They all have jobs, family commitments and most of them are hunters
themselves.
The New Jersey permit has stood the test of time. Past and present
permittees have proven that a certified leashed tracking dog can work
successfully in New Jersey. There have been no incidents involving law
enforcement since the study’s inception. The United Bowhunters of New Jersey,
The Traditional Archers of New Jersey, the New Jersey Outdoor Alliance, the New
Jersey State Federation of Sportsman Clubs, and the New Jersey Division of Fish
and Wildlife support this. So why isn’t it legal? The answer is simple. The law
needs to be amended by legislators in both the state Assembly and state Senate
and then signed by the Governor. This is not a law that can be changed by
members of the New Jersey Fish and Game Council via a Game Code amendment.
The Division of Fish and Wildlife has proposed the added language that
would legalize tracking in the state of New Jersey and is as follows,
23:4-46 Dogs not to be used
“No person shall at any time, or for any reason, hunt
for, capture or kill a wild deer with a dog. This shall not preclude the use of
certified tracking dogs on leads by persons permitted by the Division of Fish
and Wildlife to search for and recover deer lost by hunters during the regular
deer seasons.”
We have reached our goals with this permit, and it’s now time to
approach our legislators and let them know this is important to us. Every
hunter I have ever tracked for, whether we found the deer or not was grateful and supportive of the service. We’re
here to help you and now I’m going to need to ask you for some help. In the
near future, with the help of the UBNJ, I need to initiate a letter writing
campaign to selected legislators to let them know this is important to voting
hunters. Very few bills that are introduced are ultimately passed each year in
Trenton, and in order to stand a chance of amending a bill that most
legislators would consider insignificant they need to know it matters to their
constituents. A flood of letters from voting hunters will get their attention.
If
this amendment became law a certified tracker would still need to call the
Division of Law Enforcement before tracking, track on lead, obey the game laws,
and respect the private property rights of landowners.
It
will be the responsibility of the handler to obtain the required UBT 1
certification for each dog they track with and have it in their possession
while tracking. If asked to produce it by a Conservation Officer while
tracking, the handler must produce it or risk a citation.
The
reason this will be required is to insure that this amendment will not be used
as a loophole to have a dog in the field actually hunting deer. Calling the
track in and having the certification will insure that the use of the dog is
for the ethical recovery of a deer. The handler and leashed tracking dog team
is a conservation tool used for the recovery of a dead deer. A leashed tracking
dog being used to recover already shot deer is no different than a retriever
used for recovering upland birds or ducks. The hunting of the deer has already
been done.
Currently
there aren’t enough trackers permitted in the state to meet the demand.
Legalization would open the doors and attract more handlers that might be
interested in tracking, but aren’t really interested in doing the paper work
required to be on the permit. The more trackers available the less chance a
deer with no blood trail or a lost blood trail will go unrecovered. We as
hunters owe the deer we hunt every legal option we can use for recovery. A
certified leashed tracking dog is another conservation tool to help meet that
goal.
If
you have a dog that you would like to check to see if it has an aptitude for
tracking you will need to get some training materials. One way to do this is to
collect blood, the liver and skin from your own deer harvests. Collect the
blood and liver when you gut the deer and put it in a zip lock freezer bag.
Once at home put the blood in a blender, strain the blood pour into 8 oz water
bottles and freeze. One bottle will be the right amount for a training line.
Take a cap of the same type of bottle and drill a few small holes in it. When
you are ready to dispense the blood, switch caps. The liver can be divided into
thirds and used as a drag. Take a knife and poke a slit through the liver and
attach a piece of parachute cord for the drag. These can be frozen and used
more than once. The hide will be saved and used to represent the deer at the
end of the trail. A half of hide is plenty and these can be refrozen and used
over. You will need something to mark the line so when you come back with the
dog you will know exactly where it is. Clothespins with strips of flagging
material work well. Clip these on branches or brush at eye level. Remove the
pins as you pass with the dog. Don’t make the line too hard. Remember your
first step is to see if your dog has an interest in this activity. Place the
skin at the end, wait a couple of hours and see if the dog can get you to the
skin. You may just find that your dog is a natural.
The
time to legalize the use of certified, leashed tracking dogs to recover deer in
New Jersey has come, and with your commitment to help this might become a
reality.
For
additional information about tracking dogs in general go to
www.unitedbloodtrackers.org.
For
additional information about the New Jersey program or certifying a dog please
contact Darren Doran at Darren@rvwsinc.com.
Saturday, November 15, 2014
How to find deer tracking services in the New York State?
Today deer and bear gun season opened in the Southern Zone of New York. For more details on dates and length of hunting season for various types of game go to:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/huntingseasons14.pdf
If you are wound a deer and need assistance from a handler with a leashed tracking dog, you have several options depending on your location:
1. The United Blood Trackers is a national organization, who has several members in New York. For NY listings click here
2. Deer Search of Western NY call (716) 648-4355
3. Deer Search of Finger Lakes call (585) 935-5220
4. Deer Search in Eastern and Central NY call (845) 227-5099
In New York handlers are required to obtained a leashed tracking dog license from DEC. For detailed regulations associated with the license click here.
Below are just few pictures showing bow-shot deer recovered in 2014 by wirehaired dachshunds. There are many other talented handlers and dogs of various breeds who recover a lot of deer in the New York State. We will try to showcase them later on. These pics represent just a small sample, and because they show dogs out of our or related breeding, they were easily available to us.
http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/huntingseasons14.pdf
If you are wound a deer and need assistance from a handler with a leashed tracking dog, you have several options depending on your location:
1. The United Blood Trackers is a national organization, who has several members in New York. For NY listings click here
2. Deer Search of Western NY call (716) 648-4355
3. Deer Search of Finger Lakes call (585) 935-5220
4. Deer Search in Eastern and Central NY call (845) 227-5099
In New York handlers are required to obtained a leashed tracking dog license from DEC. For detailed regulations associated with the license click here.
Below are just few pictures showing bow-shot deer recovered in 2014 by wirehaired dachshunds. There are many other talented handlers and dogs of various breeds who recover a lot of deer in the New York State. We will try to showcase them later on. These pics represent just a small sample, and because they show dogs out of our or related breeding, they were easily available to us.
![]() |
| Karma is owned by Kevin Armstrong from South Bristol. He is a member of the United Blood Trackers |
![]() |
| Again Kevin Armstrong with Karma |
![]() |
| This is a first tracking season for Rob Carlton and Vinnie. Rob is a member of the United Blood Trackers and Deer Search of Finger Lakes. |
![]() |
| Walt Dixon owns two wirehaired dachshunds.This doe was recovered by a young Dachs. |
![]() |
| Walt Dixon, a member of the United Blood Trackers and Deer Search of Finger Lakes, resides in Tully. This deer was recovered by his 11-year-old Ari. |
![]() |
| This gorgeous buck was recovered by Walt Dixon and his Dachs. |
![]() |
| Matt Sacco, a member of the United Blood Trackers and Deer Search of Finger Lakes, tracks with a young Heidi. Matt lives in Ithaca. |
![]() |
| Bob Yax, a member of Deer Search of Finger Lakes, tracks with with Thor. |
![]() |
| Another deer recovered by Bob Yax and Thor. |
Labels:
blood tracking regulations,
Deer Search,
NY,
tracking wounded bear,
tracking wounded deer,
United Blood Trackers,
wirehaired dachshunds
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Blood tracking dogs become legal in Ontario
Residents of Ontario, Canada have a reason to celebrate as tracking dogs became legal there. Thanks to Joe Kopcok for the news:
Hi John. I met you inWisconsin . My
Name is Joe Kopcok and I have Slovensky Kopov dogs. Just wanted to let you know
that Ontario
has legalized the use of tracking dogs. I called Ontario Federation of Anglers
and Hunters to see what was going on with this legislation. I spoke to Mark
Ryckman and he had told me that the OFAH Big Game Advisory Committee and the
Wildlife Policy Section of the Ministry of Natural Resources had a meeting on
May 31. The OFHA was advised that there was an amendment to the Environmental
Bill of Rights with regards to use tracking dogs for big game retrieval. This is
wonderful news. Dogs must be licensed, and all normal rules are to be followed
(hunter orange valid big game licence etc.)
More info at
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2013/elaws_src_regs_r13171_e.htm
This is GREAT NEWS!
Hi John. I met you in
More info at
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2013/elaws_src_regs_r13171_e.htm
This is GREAT NEWS!
Labels:
blood tracking regulations,
Canada,
legalization
Saturday, February 23, 2013
NYS DEC 2013 Leashed Tracking Dog License Exam will be held on Friday, April 19
The Leashed Tracking Dog License Exam exam will be held on Friday, April 19, 2013. In the past the exam was usually given in August. We are not certain at this time whether the April date is an additional one or the only one in 2013. An exam/license application must be submitted by April 5. Exams will be held at DEC Regional Wildlife Offices statewide from 10 a.m. to noon, except at DEC's Avon Office, which will be held from 1 to 3 p.m.
For more information go to the DEC website at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/25020.html
For more information go to the DEC website at http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/25020.html
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Amendment to allow the use of leashed dogs to track wounded or presumed dead big game passes in the South Dakota House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee.
Jonathan Eckrich, a United Blood Trackers member from South Dakota reported today:
Today the South Dakota House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee passed (13 yea : 0 nea) an amendment to allow the use of leashed dogs to track wounded or presumed dead big game.
The bill HB1093 can be found at: http://legis.state.sd.us/ sessions/2013/ Bill.aspx?Bill=1093 Audio of the hearing can be found at http://sdpb.sd.gov/ SDPBPodcast/2013/hag21.mp3.
The bill HB1093 can be found at: http://legis.state.sd.us/
The next step is to get it passed by the full house. This vote should occur today or tomorrow. Then the Senate Ag Committee will review it, and if it passes, send it to the full Senate. Then the governor will have to sign after that. Then the real work of hammering out the details with the GF&P begins.
This is a good start.
This is a good start.
Congratulations Jonathan! This is a big step forward.
Labels:
blood tracking dogs,
blood tracking regulations,
legalization,
South Dakota,
United Blood Trackers
Saturday, July 28, 2012
NYS Leashed Tracking Dog License Guide now available online
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation released a study guide, which will help future handlers prepare for the exam needed to obtain a license in our state. The guide is now posted online at http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/ltdguide.pdf
This is a very positive move in a right direction. Hopefully more New York hunters become interested in obtaining a license required to recover wounded big game with assistance of leashed dogs.
This is a very positive move in a right direction. Hopefully more New York hunters become interested in obtaining a license required to recover wounded big game with assistance of leashed dogs.
Labels:
blood tracking,
blood tracking regulations,
NY
Friday, July 27, 2012
NY Leashed Tracking Dog License: DEC schedules exam for August 24
If you would like to use a tracking dog to recover a wounded big game in New York State, you have to get a license issued by New York Department of Environmental Conservation. To get a license you must pass an exam. This year DEC scheduled the exam for August 24. You need to register for the exam by August 17.
From press release:
The examination for individuals interested in obtaining a license to use leashed tracking dogs to find wounded or injured big game animals is scheduled for Friday, August 24, 2012 from 10:00 a.m. until noon at designated New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regional offices across the state, the agency announced today. The list of Regional Offices can be found on the DEC's website.
The deadline for registering to take the exam is August 17. A score of 80 percent or higher on the written exam and a valid New York State Big Game hunting license are mandatory requirements for receiving a license. There is a $50 license fee, and a $25 non-refundable processing fee associated with the license, which expires five years from the date of issuance.
More information regarding the leashed tracking dog license can be found on the DEC's website.
To apply for the leashed tracking dog exam, contact DEC's Special Licenses Unit by calling 518-402-8985 or by writing to:
NYS DEC
Special Licenses Unit
625 Broadway
Albany, NY 12233-4752
Email: fwslu@gw.dec.state.ny.us or
Visit the DEC website
From press release:
The examination for individuals interested in obtaining a license to use leashed tracking dogs to find wounded or injured big game animals is scheduled for Friday, August 24, 2012 from 10:00 a.m. until noon at designated New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regional offices across the state, the agency announced today. The list of Regional Offices can be found on the DEC's website.
The deadline for registering to take the exam is August 17. A score of 80 percent or higher on the written exam and a valid New York State Big Game hunting license are mandatory requirements for receiving a license. There is a $50 license fee, and a $25 non-refundable processing fee associated with the license, which expires five years from the date of issuance.
More information regarding the leashed tracking dog license can be found on the DEC's website.
To apply for the leashed tracking dog exam, contact DEC's Special Licenses Unit by calling 518-402-8985 or by writing to:
NYS DEC
Special Licenses Unit
625 Broadway
Albany, NY 12233-4752
Email: fwslu@gw.dec.state.ny.us or
Visit the DEC website
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Leashed blood trailing dogs approved by Utah
GREAT NEWS from Justin Richins from Utah, who wrote:
Utah just passed a leased tracking dog law. It was proposed at our RAC meetings and approved on Tuesday.
The wording is:
R657-5-15. Party Hunting and Use of Dogs
... (1) A person may not take big game for another person, except as provided in Section 23-19-1
and Rule R657-12.
(2) A person may not use the aid of a dog to take, chase, harm or harass big game. The use
of one blood-trailing dog controlled by leash during lawful hunting hours and within 72 hours of
shooting a big game animal is allowed to track wounded animals and aid in recovery.
Source: http://wildlife.utah.gov/ public_meetings/info/ 2012-04_packet.pdf
The wording is:
R657-5-15. Party Hunting and Use of Dogs
... (1) A person may not take big game for another person, except as provided in Section 23-19-1
and Rule R657-12.
(2) A person may not use the aid of a dog to take, chase, harm or harass big game. The use
of one blood-trailing dog controlled by leash during lawful hunting hours and within 72 hours of
shooting a big game animal is allowed to track wounded animals and aid in recovery.
Source: http://wildlife.utah.gov/
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Tracking with leashed dogs in Iowa - bill SF 2017
I found this request from Brian Hibbs on archerytalk blog. I asked him for permission to include it here. Brian has worked on this for a very long time, and hopefully it is going to be legal to track wounded deer with leashed dogs in Iowa really soon. If you are a resident of Iowa, please help.
My name is Brian Hibbs. I live near Oxford in Johnson Co, Iowa. I have had legislation introduced to allow the use of a leashed dog to track wounded deer in Iowa. I have been working on this for several years. The proposed bill has made progress and did make it through the Iowa Senate the other day with a 13 yea and 0 nea vote. It now has to get through the Iowa House. I am told that there is opposition in the House by some Southern Iowa Representatives. They are concerned this bill will cause dogs to over run their properties and create trespassing problems. This makes no sense because the bill contains specific language that states the dog will be on a lead under the control of the handler and permission must be obtained prior to tracking on private property. The DNR has told me they do not oppose this practice and I believe Diane Ford of the DNR actually helped answer questions to move this bill through the Senate. The bill is labeled SF 2017.
Please note I am not doing this to try and profit off of tracking or anything like that. I do breed tracking dogs and have about 1 litter a year. I have no problems finding homes for my pups because they are in high demand. They go throughout the country. I am doing this because it is another tool that can be used to recover a shot animal when the animal leaves a sparse blood trail or no blood trail at all and conventional tracking methods don’t work. In these situations a trained dog can improve the success rate of recovery quite a bit.
If you live in Iowa, I am asking for your support. If you could take the time to contact your House Representative and show your support I would really appreciate it. This could be done through a phone call or email. If you don’t know your Representative, you can find them through the Iowa legislation website. This would especially be helpful in the Southern Counties. I have included below an email I sent to the Representatives that I believe are opposing this bill. I also have included a letter written by John Jeanneney to our legislators. John has been tracking in New York State for many years and is a pioneer in introducing tracking in the states. He has written a couple excellent books pertaining to bowhunting, the use of leashed tracking dogs, and tracking wounded animals. He has had much experience in this field and does a good job explaining the misconceptions that opponents come up with to try and find unrealistic negatives about the practice. He and his wife run a website called “born to track”. I thank you once again for your support and if you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Brian Hibbs
Oxford, IA
www.trackingteckels.com
319-430-8065
----------
February 1, 2012
Dear Representatives,
My name is Brian Hibbs and I live in Johnson County near the town of Oxford. I have been working to get the use of tracking a wounded deer with a leashed dog legalized for several years. In July of 2010 I presented a petition to the Iowa DNR’s NRC showing how this practice is used in many states and that it is another tool to locate a deer that has been shot and cannot be found through traditional tracking methods. I presented information that tracking a deer with a dog on a leash under the complete control of a handler has proven in many other states to be a positive tool and created no extra problems for enforcement agencies in those states. Realize this is just a hunter tracking a deer like he would now with the only difference being a tracking dog ahead of him on a leash helping him to find sign he may normally miss. This petition was unanimously approved and the rulemaking process was set to go into affect. The DNR asked me if I would mind waiting until early 2011 to start the process because there wouldn’t be enough time to get the rule into the books for the fall of the 2010 hunting season and it would make it easier to just start it the following year. I agreed it would be ok to do this as long as we did what had been approved by the NRC petition. The next year rolled around and I discovered that Gov. Branstad had taken office and that he was changing the way things had been done in the past. I was told he was not opposed to this practice, just that he wanted everything to now go before his desk. This nullified all the work I had done and halted the rulemaking that should have been a done deal.
This year I had Rep. Willems propose this bill once again. I am told the bill passed out of the full Senate Natural Resources and Environment Committee yesterday (1-31-12). It is assigned as SF 2017. After speaking with Rep. Rayhons and Rep. Smith they have informed me that many of the Representatives from Southern Iowa oppose this bill because they are worried about people overrunning their land with dogs. This proposed bill has specific language addressing these concerns. It states the dog will be on a leash under full control of the handler. The bill also states the tracker will need to obtain permission from any landowner involving private property before tracking on that property. I don’t think the bill can be any more cut and dry than that. If unethical people want to break the rules they will whether it is legal or not. If you are concerned about dogs over running your properties maybe you should address coyote hunting dogs that run wherever they want uncontrolled by a leash and people chasing them in vehicles. I understand that this is a popular practice in Southern Iowa.
I ask for your support with this proposed bill. The language is cut and dry about free-running dogs and trespassing. Please do not punish the rest of us Iowan’s in the other counties if you do not trust your citizen’s in the southern counties to follow the rules. As I stated before this practice has proven to be no problem for the enforcement agencies in other states. Diane Ford of the DNR has told me that they are not opposed to this rule as they were educated on it through my previous petition. Please ask her and she will confirm this. I am including a letter from John Jeanneney of New York as of to his experience with tracking in his state. Tracking with a leashed dog has probably been going on in New York State longer than any other state.
Sincerely,
Brian Hibbs
Oxford, IA319-430-8065
------
Date: January 6, 2012
Dear Representative Rayhons,
Since I am a resident of New York State, I venture to comment on the proposed Iowa leashed tracking dog bill only because I have had 36 years of experience with leashed tracking dogs. Perhaps I can offer some useful insights. In 1976 New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation issued me a research permit to investigate the feasibility of using leashed tracking dogs to find wounded big game. This method was being used in Germany and other European countries, but in the US it appeared to many hunters and non-hunters that deer hunting and dogs did not mix in any way. The decline of deer populations that came with the use of dogs to drive deer to the gun, was well remembered.
What I proposed in New York State was something very different from deer hunting with dogs. My research demonstrated that in New York leashed tracking dogs could find mortally wounded deer when hunters could not track them by eye. The value of a good dog is that he can follow the individual scent of a wounded deer, even when there is no visible blood.
In 1986, after a long period of experimentation, the New York State Legislature passed an enabling bill to establish the use of leashed tracking dogs on a licensed basis. Since then thousands of deer have been found by licensed trackers like me. Variations of the New York law have now been approved in a total of 21 states where the use of tracking dogs had previously been illegal.
In a state like Iowa, where professionally guided hunts are an important source of state revenue, the tracking dog would maximize an outfitter’s capability to use a wildlife resource in an ethical, conservation-conscious way while satisfying the expectations of his client.
As other states have considered and ultimately approved leashed tracking dogs, certain questions and doubts have been raised. Below are responses that have been accepted as valid:
1. Experience with the use of leashed tracking dogs has shown that this has not been used as a cover when poaching deer. The deer jacker knows that there are better ways of doing this.
2. The availability of a tracking dog does not encourage irresponsible shooting any more than availability of a retriever encourages irresponsible long range shots at pheasants and waterfowl.
3. Some have wondered whether a tracking dog on a leash would be illegally used to drive deer out of heavy cover to posted hunters. Anyone who has handled a leashed dog in the woods knows how impractical this would be. There have been no reports that this is being done.
To sum up, the use of leashed tracking dogs to find wounded big game has now been time-tested around the United State for many years. It is not a crazy new idea. Writing as a man who has taken over a thousand volunteer deer calls, and who has dedicated much of his life to this cause, I urge you to give the Iowa tracking dog bill your serious consideration.
Sincerely yours,
John Jeanneney, Vice President, United Blood Trackers
1584 Helderberg Trail
Berne, NY 12023
518-872-1779
Saturday, February 4, 2012
Please support the use of tracking dogs in Kansas
Mike Martien, a UBT member, let us know that Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks is asking for comments on the use of tracking dogs for the recovery of game animals. Please click here and enter your KDWP number. Mark that you “Strongly Support” the use of tracking dogs to recover game animals when you get to that part of the survey.
Thursday, September 22, 2011
New Jersey trackers promote their blood tracking program
We received a nice report from Darren Doran about the booth that New Jersey trackers had at the 2nd Annual New Jersey Wild Outdoor Expo under the banner of the United Blood Trackers. Great job Darren and New Jersey trackers!
The expo had a very good turn out, the total number of people who attended was 4955 not including exhibitors. There was 2300 people there Saturday and at least that many on Sunday. The weather was great for expos as well as hunting. I got four calls on Sunday (took two) but that's another story. Karl is the perfect event dog. He just laid or sat on the table and let all the kids and adults pet him. He has pretty good crowd appeal. Saturday to the right of us was a retriever group with a pen full of eight-week-old chocolate lab pups and Karl still managed to draw his share of the kids. If I had a dollar for every time some one said he's such a calm dog or he's so laid back, I could have bought another dog.
We did four short demos, two on Sat and two on Sunday, and they went well. We had a table set up with our tracking gear and one with our training gear. I had a poster board up with the complete NJ permit including all the assorted forms and reports that we have to do. The Expo had a diverse crowd with a family atmosphere. There were seasoned hunters and anglers as well as people that have never set foot in the woods. The NJ tracking program was well received and I did not get one negative comment about it. I got 4 new leads for handlers/dogs for next years permit and passed out my card to any one that would take it. All in all it was a weekend well spent.
The expo had a very good turn out, the total number of people who attended was 4955 not including exhibitors. There was 2300 people there Saturday and at least that many on Sunday. The weather was great for expos as well as hunting. I got four calls on Sunday (took two) but that's another story. Karl is the perfect event dog. He just laid or sat on the table and let all the kids and adults pet him. He has pretty good crowd appeal. Saturday to the right of us was a retriever group with a pen full of eight-week-old chocolate lab pups and Karl still managed to draw his share of the kids. If I had a dollar for every time some one said he's such a calm dog or he's so laid back, I could have bought another dog.
We did four short demos, two on Sat and two on Sunday, and they went well. We had a table set up with our tracking gear and one with our training gear. I had a poster board up with the complete NJ permit including all the assorted forms and reports that we have to do. The Expo had a diverse crowd with a family atmosphere. There were seasoned hunters and anglers as well as people that have never set foot in the woods. The NJ tracking program was well received and I did not get one negative comment about it. I got 4 new leads for handlers/dogs for next years permit and passed out my card to any one that would take it. All in all it was a weekend well spent.
![]() |
| Karl, Darren Doran's wirehaired dachshund, was a hit with kids and adults alike. |
![]() |
| Rich Stollery is doing a demo with his dachshund Ember. |
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Virginia legalizes the use of tracking dogs
Virginia recently legalized the use of tracking dogs. Recent legislation allows: Tracking
dogs maintained and controlled on a
lead may be used to find a wounded or
dead bear or deer statewide during
any archery, muzzleloader, or firearm
bear or deer hunting season, or within
24 hours of the end of such season,
provided that those who are involved
in the retrieval effort have permission
to hunt on or to access the land being
searched and do not have any
weapons in their possession.
See http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/hunting/regulations/new.asp
A big thank you to everybody who supported the change and congratulations to Virginia hunters!
See http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/hunting/regulations/new.asp
A big thank you to everybody who supported the change and congratulations to Virginia hunters!
Labels:
blood tracking regulations,
legalization,
VA
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Support Pennsylvania House Bill 881
Reposted from http://www.publicopiniononline.com/opinion/ci_18636739
Pennsylvania House Bill 881 was introduced in March. This bill would provide deer hunters with a remarkable tool to aid in the recovery of their deer. HB 881 would allow the use of leashed tracking dogs for the recovery of wounded deer in Pennsylvania.
These dogs have been featured in many hunting magazines and outdoor TV shows. Studies show them to be highly effective at recovery of mortally wounded deer the hunter was unable to find himself. This method of finding a down deer is legal in 33 states.
Some outfitters in those states will use a tracking dog on every shot, to provide an efficient way to find a deer that is not observed to go down. This is very important to disabled or color blind hunters. This protects their herd from waste, is less disruptive to other hunters, and provides valuable information as to whether the animal is mortally hit.
State Rep. Mark Keller sits on the House Game and Fisheries Committee in Harrisburg. Deer hunters in his district should contact his office to ask why this method -- surveyed to be 97 percent favorable among deer hunters across the state, and supported by the NWTF, the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs, United Bowhunters of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania Game Commission -- was not on the agenda for the June committee meeting.
We can use trained dogs to aid and recover various small game in Pennsylvania. Is that wildlife any more important than whitetail deer?
Susan Edwards
Pennsylvania House Bill 881 was introduced in March. This bill would provide deer hunters with a remarkable tool to aid in the recovery of their deer. HB 881 would allow the use of leashed tracking dogs for the recovery of wounded deer in Pennsylvania.
These dogs have been featured in many hunting magazines and outdoor TV shows. Studies show them to be highly effective at recovery of mortally wounded deer the hunter was unable to find himself. This method of finding a down deer is legal in 33 states.
Some outfitters in those states will use a tracking dog on every shot, to provide an efficient way to find a deer that is not observed to go down. This is very important to disabled or color blind hunters. This protects their herd from waste, is less disruptive to other hunters, and provides valuable information as to whether the animal is mortally hit.
State Rep. Mark Keller sits on the House Game and Fisheries Committee in Harrisburg. Deer hunters in his district should contact his office to ask why this method -- surveyed to be 97 percent favorable among deer hunters across the state, and supported by the NWTF, the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs, United Bowhunters of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania Game Commission -- was not on the agenda for the June committee meeting.
We can use trained dogs to aid and recover various small game in Pennsylvania. Is that wildlife any more important than whitetail deer?
Susan Edwards
![]() |
| Susan Edwards with her beagle at Trackfest 2008 in Pennsylvania |
Labels:
blood tracking regulations,
legalization,
PA,
politics
Friday, July 22, 2011
Ontario Blood Tracking Workshop
by John Jeanneney
The Canadian Province of Ontario lies just west of the Province of Quebec. The terrain and the big game in the two provinces are quite similar: moose, whitetail deer, black bear and caribou are the principle big game animals hunted. There the similarities end. Quebec has an active program of using tracking dogs to find wounded animals. Ontario has nothing of the kind.
The Canadian Province of Ontario lies just west of the Province of Quebec. The terrain and the big game in the two provinces are quite similar: moose, whitetail deer, black bear and caribou are the principle big game animals hunted. There the similarities end. Quebec has an active program of using tracking dogs to find wounded animals. Ontario has nothing of the kind.
In Quebec the principle
language is French, and outfitters had access to tracking ideas and inspiration
that came from France.
Their tracking dogs, in this case wirehaired dachshunds, came from France and Belgium. A tracking dog handler’s
association ACCSQ was founded in 2008 and today it has 240 members. The hunting
regulations for big game have been officially “reinterpreted” by the Ministry
of Natural Resources (MNR) and in 2009
ACCSQ handlers found 71 moose, 88 deer and 4 bears. An impressive beginning.
Meanwhile nothing much has been happening in Ontario where leashed
tracking dogs have been deemed illegal by most provincial conservation
officers. A couple of tracking
workshops for NAVHDA in the 90s, presented
by Hans Klein and myself, did not produce enduring interest. What Ontario seemed to lack was
a “Point Man”, someone who could rally the Hunter Lobby (OFAH), hunting clubs
and individual hunters to encourage the MNR to change regulations on the use of
dogs, in this case leashed tracking dogs. Drawing on the American experience,
we have learned that state Fish and Game Departments seldom make a move unless there
is evidence of strong sportsmen support.
Laurel Whistance-Smith of Pontypool, Ontario,
was fully aware of these problems when she organized the recent tracking
workshop that took place there. Laurel is a retired
biologist of the Ontario MNR, and she is also a long-time breeder of the
European type of wirehaired dachshunds. She has not tracked herself, but she
has bred a number of fine tracking dogs that are working in the United States.
The workshop was to be a small, rather informal gathering of people who have
bought dogs from Laurel
in the last couple of years. These dogs were sired by our stud dogs, Billy, Joeri and
Tommy.
With some doubts in my mind about a long term impact of the
workshop I agreed to conduct it on July 17 and 18. Darren Doran, the “Point
Man” for New Jersey’s
experimental program accompanied me and was tremendously valuable for both his
dog and political experience. On Friday
afternoon, the 16th, we laid out five training/evaluation lines of about 400 meters for the people we expected
to come with partially trained dogs. These lines were to be worked the next
morning. Weather predictions were for a very hot Saturday for where we would be
working, 20 miles north of Lake
Ontario. We wanted to
begin the dog work as early as possible, and then use the hottest part of the
day for PowerPoint presentations.
On Saturday morning only three dogs and handlers showed up
and were available to work the five lines that we had laid out. This was
disappointing! However, I was impressed
with the dogs that were present. Scott Leindecker worked his 10-month-old bitch
Arwen first. She showed excellent tracking desire and line control. We liked
the way she worked her checks with focused intent. She showed that she was
ready to find wounded deer as soon as the Ontario MNR gives her the go ahead.
![]() |
| Scott Leindecker and Arwen find the deer skin at the end of the track. |
The next dog, Yoda was handled by his owner Ernie
Schroeder. Yoda worked more slowly with
somewhat closer check work than Arwen. This is a style that I have grown to
appreciate more and more as I get older and older! At 2 ½ Yoda is ready for real work!
![]() |
| Ernie Schroeder and Yoda |
Cesar owned by Tom Bunge showed that he was a good dog that
had been corrupted by disrespectful grey squirrels. At home frisking squirrels
in his back yard had teased him to a frenzy. Once he scented squirrels on his
evaluation blood line, it was all over. He could focus on nothing else. There
are good ways to de-squirrel a tracking dog, and these were discussed when we
finally got to the deer skin at the end of the line.
![]() |
| Tom Bunge and Cesar |
Later in the morning Tom worked Cesar on a second, unused
line and things went better. It was siesta time for the squirrels and they were
no longer laying seductive trails for Caesar. He focused better on the most
important thing in the world: blood tracking.
After lunch we moved into Laurel’s
spacious garage and examined the structure and growth of tracking
legislation in the United States
and Canada.
At this point Kerry Coleman joined our group. Kenny is a recently retired
biologist from the Ontario MNR who is now on the Governing Board of OFAH. Kerry
was enthusiastic about the leashed tracking dog idea and had many concrete
ideas about how it could be implemented in Ontario. He believes that more promotion and
the foundation of an Ontario
tracking organization will be essential. I made it clear that UBT could be
very helpful in a future Ontario campaign, and
I pointed out what we had done in the United States. The importance of
the field experience in neighboring Quebec
was recognized, but the provincial
legal structure in Quebec is quite
different from that of Ontario.
Ontario will not be able to follow the Quebec plan the way Vermont
followed the New York
plan in 1996.
At this point the workshop really became a meeting, and I
could see that the long-awaited point men
for Ontario
were emerging. Scott Leindecker, who lives in Sault Ste. Marie, far to the
west near Michigan’s
Upper Peninsula, is an Ontario Provincial Police officer, who clearly has the drive to hunt, track
and promote. He reminded me a bit of Chuck Collier, the Michigan State Police
Officer who lives not too far away from him. They both have gifted
tracking dogs, and as we all know, that helps to keep the fires burning.
![]() |
| Nancy and Scott Leindecker from Sault Ste Marie |
Ernie Schroeder was equally impressive. He is a chiropractor
who can arrange his schedule to accommodate the things that are important to
him ….like hunting and tracking. He has a strong background in hunting
dogs and now he has a very good wirehaired dachshund. He lives
close to the political action sites of Toronto
and Peterborough,
and he is motivated to help the cause.
Tom Bunge has some work to do with his squirrel dog, but he
has the great advantage of hunting experience as a forester in his native Germany.
Currently he is an engineer with all the electronic media skills to organize
hunters in the digital age.
Laurel Whistance-Smith, hostess of the workshop, does not track
herself, but she is an excellent organizer and has maintained excellent
contacts in the MNR where she worked for twenty years. Clearly Ontario now has what it
takes to get a tracking program going.
We wound down on late Saturday afternoon with a mini-course
on the grooming of wirehaired dachshunds. Vicki Thomas showed us how to strip
down a wire coat so that a sometimes shaggy dog becomes a sleek, well-protected
worker, which can slip through the briars and burrs. Vicki Thomas is a
well-known show judge and professional groomer. Her practical advice was useful
for working dachshund owners even if they never go to a dog show.
![]() |
| Vicki Thomas grooms Arwen |
![]() |
| Arwen - before grooming |
![]() |
| Arwen - after grooming. Arwen was bred by Laurel Whistance-Smith and she is out of Hexel is a daughter of our Tommy vom Linteler-Forst |
![]() |
| Yoda was also bred by Laurel and he is out of Lily and our Joeri vom Nonnenschlag |
The Sunday workshop program began at 7AM as we all munched
breakfast and I went over the slides of
a practical PowerPoint program on the tricks, trials and tribulations of
finding wounded game in the woods with a tracking dog. We concluded at noon. It
was an excellent workshop with little
lecture and lots of discussion.
Many thanks to Darren Doran for all his help including some of the photos above.
Labels:
blood tracking regulations,
blood tracking training,
Canada,
John,
legalization,
wirehaired dachshunds,
workshop
Friday, March 25, 2011
North Carolina House Bill 29 passes the Senate
Yesterday North Carolina House Bill 29 authorizing a hunter to use a handheld light and a single dog on a leash to retrieve a killed or wounded deer passed the Senate and will be sent to to Governor Perdue to be signed into law. The text of the Bill can be accessed click here.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Blood tracking dogs in Iowa
Brian Hibbs who has been working very hard to legalize blood tracking dogs in Iowa wrote:
The leashed dog tracking is getting close to being a reality in Iowa. After some hard work this is the latest recent action proposed by the Iowa NRC. Please pay attention to #3 relating to using dogs to recover wounded deer in Iowa. Do me a favor and show your support for this action. Send the Iowa DNR a letter of recommendation for this action to http://www.iowadnr.com/. Let’s do the ethical thing and give our dogs a job to do!
If you decide to let the Iowa DNR know that you support the leashed dog tracking action please send an email to Dale.Garner@dnr.iowa.gov. He is the Wildlife Bureau Chief. There is no need to write a long letter. You can just let him know you think this would be a good thing for Iowa. If you want to forward this email to any other interested people their support will also be appreciated.
Thank you,
Brian Hibbs
Oxford, IA 52322
hibrig@southslope.net
http://www.trackingteckels.com/
NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION [571]
Notice of Intended Action
Pursuant to the authority of Iowa Code subsection 455A.5(6), the Natural Resource Commission hereby gives Notice of Intended Action to amend Chapter 94, “Nonresident Deer Hunting,” Iowa Administrative Code.
Chapter 94 gives the regulations for nonresident deer hunting and includes season dates, bag limits, possession limits, shooting hours, areas open to hunting, licensing procedures, means and methods of take, and transportation and reporting requirements.
The proposed amendments:
1. Clarify which cartridges are legal for deer hunting with a handgun. The minimum length requirement removes some cartridges which are not designed for hunting deer.
2. Modify the hunter orange requirement for blinds during the shotgun season so that the visible orange is a minimum size, not shape.
3. Allow dogs to be used to recover wounded deer. The dog must be on a leash and the hunter must have permission to track a wounded deer with a dog on private property.
4. Clarify that antlerless deer are tagged on a leg and antlered deer are tagged on the main beam of the antler. This will help keep the tag from pulling off accidentally during transport.
Any interested person may make written suggestions or comments on the proposed amendments on or before April 27, 2011. Written comments may be directed to the Wildlife Bureau's Web site at www.iowadnr.com or may be sent to the Wildlife Bureau Chief, Department of Natural Resources, Wallace State Office Building, Des Moines, Iowa 50319-10034; fax (515) 281-6794. Persons who wish to convey their views orally should contact the Wildlife Bureau at (515) 281-5034 or at the Wildlife Bureau offices on the fourth floor of the Wallace State Office Building.
There will be a public hearing held via the Iowa Communications Network on April 27, 2011, from 6 to 9 p.m. Interested persons should contact the Department at (515) 281-5034 for a list of hearing locations or go to the Department's Web site at http://www.iowadnr.com/. At the public hearing, persons may present their views either orally or in writing. Participants will be asked to give their names and addresses for the record and to confine their remarks to the subject of the amendments.
Any persons who intend to attend the public hearings and have special requirements such as those related to hearing or mobility impairments should contact the Department of Natural Resources and request specific accommodations.
These amendments are intended to implement Iowa Code sections 481A.38, 481A.39, 481A.48, 483A.1, 483A.8 and 483A.24.
The leashed dog tracking is getting close to being a reality in Iowa. After some hard work this is the latest recent action proposed by the Iowa NRC. Please pay attention to #3 relating to using dogs to recover wounded deer in Iowa. Do me a favor and show your support for this action. Send the Iowa DNR a letter of recommendation for this action to http://www.iowadnr.com/. Let’s do the ethical thing and give our dogs a job to do!
If you decide to let the Iowa DNR know that you support the leashed dog tracking action please send an email to Dale.Garner@dnr.iowa.gov. He is the Wildlife Bureau Chief. There is no need to write a long letter. You can just let him know you think this would be a good thing for Iowa. If you want to forward this email to any other interested people their support will also be appreciated.
Thank you,
Brian Hibbs
Oxford, IA 52322
hibrig@southslope.net
http://www.trackingteckels.com/
NATURAL RESOURCE COMMISSION [571]
Notice of Intended Action
Pursuant to the authority of Iowa Code subsection 455A.5(6), the Natural Resource Commission hereby gives Notice of Intended Action to amend Chapter 94, “Nonresident Deer Hunting,” Iowa Administrative Code.
Chapter 94 gives the regulations for nonresident deer hunting and includes season dates, bag limits, possession limits, shooting hours, areas open to hunting, licensing procedures, means and methods of take, and transportation and reporting requirements.
The proposed amendments:
1. Clarify which cartridges are legal for deer hunting with a handgun. The minimum length requirement removes some cartridges which are not designed for hunting deer.
2. Modify the hunter orange requirement for blinds during the shotgun season so that the visible orange is a minimum size, not shape.
3. Allow dogs to be used to recover wounded deer. The dog must be on a leash and the hunter must have permission to track a wounded deer with a dog on private property.
4. Clarify that antlerless deer are tagged on a leg and antlered deer are tagged on the main beam of the antler. This will help keep the tag from pulling off accidentally during transport.
Any interested person may make written suggestions or comments on the proposed amendments on or before April 27, 2011. Written comments may be directed to the Wildlife Bureau's Web site at www.iowadnr.com or may be sent to the Wildlife Bureau Chief, Department of Natural Resources, Wallace State Office Building, Des Moines, Iowa 50319-10034; fax (515) 281-6794. Persons who wish to convey their views orally should contact the Wildlife Bureau at (515) 281-5034 or at the Wildlife Bureau offices on the fourth floor of the Wallace State Office Building.
There will be a public hearing held via the Iowa Communications Network on April 27, 2011, from 6 to 9 p.m. Interested persons should contact the Department at (515) 281-5034 for a list of hearing locations or go to the Department's Web site at http://www.iowadnr.com/. At the public hearing, persons may present their views either orally or in writing. Participants will be asked to give their names and addresses for the record and to confine their remarks to the subject of the amendments.
Any persons who intend to attend the public hearings and have special requirements such as those related to hearing or mobility impairments should contact the Department of Natural Resources and request specific accommodations.
These amendments are intended to implement Iowa Code sections 481A.38, 481A.39, 481A.48, 483A.1, 483A.8 and 483A.24.
Friday, March 4, 2011
United Blood Trackers and the Expansion of Leashed Tracking Dogs
by John Jeanneney for Full Cry, March 2011
The count of states that have legalized leashed tracking dogs is now up to 22; the rate of legalization has been accelerating since the year 2000. This has been due in good part to the promotional and educational work of United Blood Trackers. This organization has been making hunters and outfitters aware of what can be accomplished by a well-trained leashed dog and handler team. Most hunters now understand that that use of tracking dogs to find deer after the shot is very different from hunting deer with dogs. A dog on a leash does not disrupt deer hunting.
In New Mexico, which legalized in 2007, it was the elk outfitters who encouraged the state DNR to change their regulations. One outfitter told me “Our rifle and bowhunting clients were losing a certain percentage of elk. This had been accepted. Now we know that something can be done about this!” He had learned about leashed tracking dogs from sources outside the state. The UBT web site and its members were behind much of this educational process. If one goes to the UBT website information on the regulations of all the dog tracking states is available.
In Iowa, two UBT members, Brian Hibbs, and Patrick McCaffrey, an Ohio attorney, worked with the state DNR. With a PowerPoint presentation and supporting documentation they won the DNR over to the idea of legalization. Tracking dogs will be working in Iowa next fall.
Of course there is a lot more than legalization involved in establishing the use of tracking dogs in a new state. As we all know hunting is a matter of the heart as well as the mind, and the heart changes more slowly. In much of the United States, outside of the South, we all bought up to understand that “deer hunting and dogs don’t mix.” Changes in attitude don’t come over night.
This was quite evident in the state of Maine, where the DNR promoted and established the legal use of leashed tracking dogs in 2002. Little was done at that time to publicize this change or to educate hunters and handlers; little tracking activity took place in the first few years. I made phone calls to a number of hunting guides, and got several types of responses. One guide said, “We don’t have any real need for this up here!”; another claimed that he had tried it and it didn’t work very well.
The doors in Maine didn’t open a crack until UBT member Susanne Hamilton, a German woman with a German dachshund, began tracking and finding wounded whitetails in the southern part of the state. In 2010 at the annual banquet of the Maine Bowhunters Association Susanne was Guest of Honor and named Supporter of the Year 2009 in recognition of her “accomplishments and dedication to the bowhunting sport”.
In Maine the greatest need for tracking dogs today is in moose hunting. Moose with their great body mass and insulating coat of hair spoil rapidly if they are not found within six hours. Little progress has yet been made in introducing the use of tracking dogs in moose hunting. In 2009 UBT presented a tracking workshop in New Hampshire near the Maine border, but no Maine guides attended. Sometimes a new idea like the use of tracking dogs is a tough sell.
This winter United Blood Trackers has been invited to have an educational booth and a seminar at two Deer and Turkey Expos organized by Target Communications. The first event in Lansing, Michigan has already taken place as I write, and the second in Columbus Ohio will take place on March 18-20.
The Lansing, Michigan booth was a great success. The presence at the booth of tracking dogs, including “cute” wirehaired dachshunds pulled in the crowd, and then the experienced handlers manning the booth could explain what the dogs has already been accomplishing in Michigan. At the end of the day we were all hoarse from talking about our sport and its purpose. Leashed tracking dogs have been legal in Michigan since 1998, but it was surprising how often we were asked: “When are they going to start this in Michigan”. It takes a few years for things to sink in! There are at least 20 very active handlers now in Michigan, but after the Lansing Expo there will be more of them.
UBT actually began focusing its efforts on Michigan last year when it held a “Trackfest” tracking workshop in Marshall. This drew 26 already converted trackers from Michigan and surrounding states. The focus at the Marshall Trackfest was on training dogs and handlers rather than on promotion. Both approaches are needed and our next target is Ohio.
The Deer and Turkey Expo in Columbus on March 18-20 will be a big challenge. Ohio legalized tracking dogs in 2005, but as in Maine there was no publicity or education about how tracking dogs are trained and used. As of 2010 there were only a handful of serious handlers tracking, and deer hunters are still largely unaware of the possibilities. There is much to be accomplished in Ohio.
The last major event of this year for UBT will be Trackfest 2011 to be held on May 21-23 near Pocahontas, Arkansas. Tom Baker is hosting the event at his Buck Hollow Ranch located in northeast Arkansas close to the Missouri border. This workshop will consist of indoor presentations on training, tracking breeds and real tracking in the woods combined with outdoor field work, evaluations and tests. This will be the 6th annual Trackfest put on by UBT, and early evidence suggests that it will be the largest ever.
Using your dog to find shed antlers in early spring fits in perfectly with tracking wounded big game in the fall. This year Roger Sigler, a professional trainer of antler dogs, will be one of our speakers.
Both new and experienced handlers, who have attended previous Trackfests, say that they learned much from seeing different types of dogs work training lines. After each exercise experienced UBT instructors discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each dog and suggest how the work can be improved. In an atmosphere of camaraderie at a Trackfest everyone exchanges tracking stories; the learning and the fun never stop.
More details and registration materials are available click here. You can register by contacting Todd Rockhold at 701-340-6367 or stonegripper@gmail.com.
The count of states that have legalized leashed tracking dogs is now up to 22; the rate of legalization has been accelerating since the year 2000. This has been due in good part to the promotional and educational work of United Blood Trackers. This organization has been making hunters and outfitters aware of what can be accomplished by a well-trained leashed dog and handler team. Most hunters now understand that that use of tracking dogs to find deer after the shot is very different from hunting deer with dogs. A dog on a leash does not disrupt deer hunting.
![]() |
| Map showing the 22 states in which tracking dogs have been legalized |
In New Mexico, which legalized in 2007, it was the elk outfitters who encouraged the state DNR to change their regulations. One outfitter told me “Our rifle and bowhunting clients were losing a certain percentage of elk. This had been accepted. Now we know that something can be done about this!” He had learned about leashed tracking dogs from sources outside the state. The UBT web site and its members were behind much of this educational process. If one goes to the UBT website information on the regulations of all the dog tracking states is available.
In Iowa, two UBT members, Brian Hibbs, and Patrick McCaffrey, an Ohio attorney, worked with the state DNR. With a PowerPoint presentation and supporting documentation they won the DNR over to the idea of legalization. Tracking dogs will be working in Iowa next fall.
Of course there is a lot more than legalization involved in establishing the use of tracking dogs in a new state. As we all know hunting is a matter of the heart as well as the mind, and the heart changes more slowly. In much of the United States, outside of the South, we all bought up to understand that “deer hunting and dogs don’t mix.” Changes in attitude don’t come over night.
This was quite evident in the state of Maine, where the DNR promoted and established the legal use of leashed tracking dogs in 2002. Little was done at that time to publicize this change or to educate hunters and handlers; little tracking activity took place in the first few years. I made phone calls to a number of hunting guides, and got several types of responses. One guide said, “We don’t have any real need for this up here!”; another claimed that he had tried it and it didn’t work very well.
The doors in Maine didn’t open a crack until UBT member Susanne Hamilton, a German woman with a German dachshund, began tracking and finding wounded whitetails in the southern part of the state. In 2010 at the annual banquet of the Maine Bowhunters Association Susanne was Guest of Honor and named Supporter of the Year 2009 in recognition of her “accomplishments and dedication to the bowhunting sport”.
In Maine the greatest need for tracking dogs today is in moose hunting. Moose with their great body mass and insulating coat of hair spoil rapidly if they are not found within six hours. Little progress has yet been made in introducing the use of tracking dogs in moose hunting. In 2009 UBT presented a tracking workshop in New Hampshire near the Maine border, but no Maine guides attended. Sometimes a new idea like the use of tracking dogs is a tough sell.
This winter United Blood Trackers has been invited to have an educational booth and a seminar at two Deer and Turkey Expos organized by Target Communications. The first event in Lansing, Michigan has already taken place as I write, and the second in Columbus Ohio will take place on March 18-20.
The Lansing, Michigan booth was a great success. The presence at the booth of tracking dogs, including “cute” wirehaired dachshunds pulled in the crowd, and then the experienced handlers manning the booth could explain what the dogs has already been accomplishing in Michigan. At the end of the day we were all hoarse from talking about our sport and its purpose. Leashed tracking dogs have been legal in Michigan since 1998, but it was surprising how often we were asked: “When are they going to start this in Michigan”. It takes a few years for things to sink in! There are at least 20 very active handlers now in Michigan, but after the Lansing Expo there will be more of them.
![]() |
| The UBT booth and staff at the Lansing Michigan Deer Expo. Left to right: Don Dickerson, Brian Reisner, Kyle Stiffler, John Jeanneney, Chuck Collier, Chris Hodyna. |
![]() |
| Larry Gohlke explains the use of scent shoes in the training of blood tracking dogs. |
![]() |
| This is a Bavarian Mountain Bloodhound owned by Chris Hodyna. |
![]() |
| Cheri Faust says hello to Brian Reisner's wirehaired dachshund puppy. |
UBT actually began focusing its efforts on Michigan last year when it held a “Trackfest” tracking workshop in Marshall. This drew 26 already converted trackers from Michigan and surrounding states. The focus at the Marshall Trackfest was on training dogs and handlers rather than on promotion. Both approaches are needed and our next target is Ohio.
![]() |
| Participants at Trackfest 2010 in |
The Deer and Turkey Expo in Columbus on March 18-20 will be a big challenge. Ohio legalized tracking dogs in 2005, but as in Maine there was no publicity or education about how tracking dogs are trained and used. As of 2010 there were only a handful of serious handlers tracking, and deer hunters are still largely unaware of the possibilities. There is much to be accomplished in Ohio.
The last major event of this year for UBT will be Trackfest 2011 to be held on May 21-23 near Pocahontas, Arkansas. Tom Baker is hosting the event at his Buck Hollow Ranch located in northeast Arkansas close to the Missouri border. This workshop will consist of indoor presentations on training, tracking breeds and real tracking in the woods combined with outdoor field work, evaluations and tests. This will be the 6th annual Trackfest put on by UBT, and early evidence suggests that it will be the largest ever.
Using your dog to find shed antlers in early spring fits in perfectly with tracking wounded big game in the fall. This year Roger Sigler, a professional trainer of antler dogs, will be one of our speakers.
Both new and experienced handlers, who have attended previous Trackfests, say that they learned much from seeing different types of dogs work training lines. After each exercise experienced UBT instructors discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each dog and suggest how the work can be improved. In an atmosphere of camaraderie at a Trackfest everyone exchanges tracking stories; the learning and the fun never stop.
More details and registration materials are available click here. You can register by contacting Todd Rockhold at 701-340-6367 or stonegripper@gmail.com.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Blood tracking in New Jersey with Darren Doran and Karl
In 2010 blood tracking in New Jersey is its experimental phase. You can read more about its legalities click here. We received this report from Darren Doran, who is one of the ten trackers listed on the Wildlife Management Permit. Darren and his dog Karl (a 20-month-old son of Billy and Laurel Whistance-Smith's Pagan) have passed a necessary tracking test and this year they have been on a number of calls.
Darren, who is a member of United Blood Trackers and Deer Search, wrote:
I met a friend I hadn't seen in awhile. We got talking and he told me he had hit a buck that morning. He didn't know that I had a tracking dog or that I could track in Jersey. I told him I'd be willing to track for him if he wanted. He agreed, and we met about 2:30 in the afternoon. I made the call to Fish and Wildlife and did our paperwork. The buck was hit at 8:00 am, and the hunter was able to get a second shot at the deer. He knew his first arrow was back but wasn't sure about the second, and he hadn't found either one. The deer had bedded twice in sight, and after an hour it got up and walked away. The hunter snuck out of his stand and noticed some blood on the way out. There had been another buck with the one that was wounded, and when I started Karl he pulled off the hit buck and started on the healthy deer. I corrected him and restarted.
Karl found and tracked past the first arrow, which was covered in what looked like liver blood. He tracked up to the next arrow but it looked like it was a miss.We were in oaks, blueberry scrub and green briars. Karl was under all the briars and I was on the top.We got to the top of a small hill. We had just tracked through a bed, and I noticed Karl air scenting. I thought to myself that we were getting close. No sooner had that thought left my head when Karl went under a blow down and the buck blasted out the other side. I shouted to the hunter that the deer was up and running. I couldn't get through the blow down and had to go around. Karl was barking like crazy. The hunter had got 2 shots at the deer while it was running by and had one arrow left. Within 20 yds Karl had the deer backed and bayed in a patch of mountain laurel. He had gone under a limb that the size of my forearm, and a small stub had caught his collar and stopped his forward motion. He was about 8 yds from the deer and going nuts. The buck had his ears laid back and was rolling eyes and moving his head up and down. I grabbed Karl and moved back behind a large tree. As soon as I moved back with the dog, the deer went down and the hunter got his last arrow in him. I'm just lucky that deer didn't charge Karl or myself. That dog is fearless and he's doing a little better each time we go out.
It was quite a coincidence but on the same day another e-mail arrived in my Inbox titled "one reason to legalize blood tracking in NJ". Teddy Moritz from New Jersey sent this picture with her comment.
Darren, who is a member of United Blood Trackers and Deer Search, wrote:
I met a friend I hadn't seen in awhile. We got talking and he told me he had hit a buck that morning. He didn't know that I had a tracking dog or that I could track in Jersey. I told him I'd be willing to track for him if he wanted. He agreed, and we met about 2:30 in the afternoon. I made the call to Fish and Wildlife and did our paperwork. The buck was hit at 8:00 am, and the hunter was able to get a second shot at the deer. He knew his first arrow was back but wasn't sure about the second, and he hadn't found either one. The deer had bedded twice in sight, and after an hour it got up and walked away. The hunter snuck out of his stand and noticed some blood on the way out. There had been another buck with the one that was wounded, and when I started Karl he pulled off the hit buck and started on the healthy deer. I corrected him and restarted.
Karl found and tracked past the first arrow, which was covered in what looked like liver blood. He tracked up to the next arrow but it looked like it was a miss.We were in oaks, blueberry scrub and green briars. Karl was under all the briars and I was on the top.We got to the top of a small hill. We had just tracked through a bed, and I noticed Karl air scenting. I thought to myself that we were getting close. No sooner had that thought left my head when Karl went under a blow down and the buck blasted out the other side. I shouted to the hunter that the deer was up and running. I couldn't get through the blow down and had to go around. Karl was barking like crazy. The hunter had got 2 shots at the deer while it was running by and had one arrow left. Within 20 yds Karl had the deer backed and bayed in a patch of mountain laurel. He had gone under a limb that the size of my forearm, and a small stub had caught his collar and stopped his forward motion. He was about 8 yds from the deer and going nuts. The buck had his ears laid back and was rolling eyes and moving his head up and down. I grabbed Karl and moved back behind a large tree. As soon as I moved back with the dog, the deer went down and the hunter got his last arrow in him. I'm just lucky that deer didn't charge Karl or myself. That dog is fearless and he's doing a little better each time we go out.
![]() |
| Daren recovered his friend's buck with Karl's help. It was quite an adventure! |
Labels:
blood tracking dogs,
blood tracking regulations,
coyotes,
NJ,
tracking wounded deer,
wirehaired dachshunds
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

































